Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-47408
Title: Optimizing multiomics sample preparation: comparative evaluation of extraction protocols for HepG2 cells
Author(s): Arnst, Tilman F.
Hemmer, Selina
Fecher-Trost, Claudia
Wagmann, Lea
Meyer, Markus R.
Language: English
Title: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Volume: 418
Issue: 3
Pages: 813-827
Publisher/Platform: Springer Nature
Year of Publication: 2025
Free key words: Multiomics
Sample preparation
HepG2 cells
Metabolomics
Proteomics
Mass spectrometry
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Multiomics approaches enable a comprehensive characterization of complex biological systems by simultaneously investi gating multiple molecular layers. Generating multiple omics datasets from a single sample is crucial to minimize biologi cal variability and ensure cross-layer consistency, which is critical for robust downstream data analysis. However, existing workflows often require adaptation to the specific experimental context and instrumental setup. This study systematically compared two established protocols for the simultaneous extraction of metabolites, lipids, and proteins from HepG2 cells: (i) a biphasic extraction with subsequent overnight protein digestion from the interphase pellet, and (ii) a monophasic extrac tion involving on-bead protein digestion. For the monophasic approach, we further investigated the effects of bead size and digestion conditions. Metabolomics samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry; lipidomics and proteomics samples were analyzed by nano-scale liquid chromatography coupled with ion mobility separation and high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Each method was evaluated in terms of total feature count, selectivity, reproducibility, handling complexity, and overall performance. While neither protocol was optimal across all criteria, the monophasic extraction using paramagnetic beads with shortened incubation time proved to be the most reproducible, efficient, and cost-effective solution for in-house multiomics workflows in HepG2 cells.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1007/s00216-025-06235-x
URL of the first publication: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-025-06235-x
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-474084
hdl:20.500.11880/41456
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-47408
ISSN: 1618-2650
1618-2642
Date of registration: 30-Mar-2026
Description of the related object: Supplementary Information
Related object: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00216-025-06235-x/MediaObjects/216_2025_6235_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Veit Flockerzi
M - Prof. Dr. Markus Meyer
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00216-025-06235-x.pdf902,28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons