Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
doi:10.22028/D291-48597 | Title: | Familiarity and literal plausibility, not transparency, drive idiom comprehension in adult readers with low literacy skills in Easy German |
| Author(s): | Wieland, Lena Reich, Ingo |
| Language: | English |
| Title: | Frontiers in Language Sciences |
| Volume: | 5 |
| Publisher/Platform: | Frontiers |
| Year of Publication: | 2026 |
| Free key words: | Easy German (Leichte Sprache) familiarity figurative language idiom comprehension individual differences literal plausibility low literacy transparency |
| DDC notations: | 400 Language, linguistics |
| Publikation type: | Journal Article |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Easy German (Leichte Sprache) is a rule-guided variety of German intended to increase the accessibility of written information for people with cognitive disabilities and adults with low literacy skills. Although existing guidelines often discourage the use of idioms, experimental evidence on idiom processing in these target groups remains scarce. We investigated how literacy, functional familiarity, transparency, and literal plausibility jointly shape idiom comprehension and preferences in adult low-literacy readers. Methods: In a norming study with literate German speakers (Experiment 1; Prolific; 71 verb-phrase idioms), we obtainedseven-point ratings of transparency and literal plausibility (reverse-coded so that higher values indicate a more plausible literal scene) and selected 24 idioms to instantiate a 2 × 2design (high/low transparency × high/low plausibility). Literacy in the target group was assessed with otu.lea (Experiment 2) and transformed into a quasi-continuous index(0–100).InExperiment3(nocontext),30low-literacyadultsexplainedeach idiom, providing ameasureoffunctionalfamiliarity. In Experiment4(samecohort after ∼6 months; n = 26), idioms were embedded in Easy German contexts and tested using an endorsement task (idiom vs. paraphrase vs. distractor) and a ranking task (gold/silver/bronze). Results: Mixed-effects models showed that, in Experiment 3, figurative accuracy increased with literacy (β =0.028,p=0.0019)andwasrelatedtoliteralplausibility (β = 0.569, p < 0.001), with a strong transparency × plausibility interaction (β = −1.457, p < 0.001): idioms that were both transparent and literally plausible yielded the lowest figurative accuracy. In Experiment 4, idiom endorsement was predicted by functional familiarity from Experiment 3 (β = 0.702, p = 0.025), while ranking responses showed robust distractor rejection and no reliable disadvantage for idioms relative to meaning-consistent paraphrases. Discussion: Overall,idiomaccessibilityinlow-literacyadultsappearstobedriven primarily by literacy, functional familiarity, and literal-figurative competition indexed by plausibility, whereas transparency does not emerge as a reliable stand-alone facilitator. These findings challenge Easy German recommendations that prioritize transparency and instead support applied strategies centered on audience familiarity, low literal plausibility, and contextual or paraphrastic scaffolding. |
| DOI of the first publication: | 10.3389/flang.2026.1872761 |
| URL of the first publication: | https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2026.1872761 |
| Link to this record: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-485976 hdl:20.500.11880/42469 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-48597 |
| ISSN: | 2813-4605 |
| Date of registration: | 25-Aug-2026 |
| Faculty: | P - Philosophische Fakultät |
| Department: | P - Germanistik |
| Professorship: | P - Prof. Dr. Ingo Reich |
| Collections: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Files for this record:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| flang-5-1872761.pdf | 1,03 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

